Book review: “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla”

written by Liz of Inventing My Life; also crossposted from Eyes on Books 

I just finished reading “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla: Raising Healthy Black and Biracial Children in a Race-Conscious World” by Marguerite Wright, and I found it tremendously informative and helpful.

What I found most useful about the book is that it takes a developmental approach; each section covers specific ages, from early toddlerhood through the teenage years, and describes what children at those ages are able to understand about skin color, race, identity, and racism. Each section also includes suggestions for parents to help their children develop healthy attitudes about race in general and a strong sense of themselves at each stage of development, as well as resources for teachers and parents to address issues of race in school settings. There’s also a great chart at the end of the book that summarizes the main ideas from the book for each stage of development.

The stage of development that I found most interesting was the early toddler/pre-school years. In the first few chapters, Wright explains that young children do not understand that skin color is a permanent feature, and also do not make the same association between the words for certain skin colors and specific racial or ethnic groups that adults do. As Wright puts it, “Just because a pre-schooler can tell us the color of her skin, it doesn’t necessarily follow that she is also aware of her racial identity.” Every so often on the adoption Yahoo groups I read, a parent will ask what they should do when their young Ethiopian child says something like “I want to be white like Mommy” or “When I die and go to heaven, I’m going to be white.” Reading “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla,” I finally understand that statements like this don’t mean children hate their own race/color or have low self-esteem, but that they still have some “magical thinking” about being able to change their skin color. I don’t know why this explanation didn’t occur to me sooner – I mean, I read Piaget in college and know all about the development of object permanence, etc. – but I’m glad to understand it now!

The chapters on the teen years were also interesting and helpful. Wright explains that teens are exploring their identity and this is why race seems to become so important during high school, with black students feeling like they have to “choose sides.” Again, I found it very helpful to think about race as just one component of a normal developmental stage, instead of the single most important factor to consider when raising a child from Ethiopia. The chapters on the teen years also included a list of ways to react to racist comments or behaviors that parents can teach their teenagers, and I thought I could use many of the techniques myself when dealing with insensitive or outright bigoted comments that people might make about my transracial family when my child is still young.

Another really helpful part of the book for me was the section on choosing a school. Wright doesn’t say that one particular type of school is best for black children, but gives lists of questions that parents should ask when considering a predominantly white school, a predominantly black school, or an integrated school. Wright makes the point, for example, that “integration does not automatically produce racial harmony unless such harmony is actively pursued,” and suggests that parents look at factors such as whether the staff is integrated and if the curriculum includes black history and literature before deciding that a school with equal numbers of black and white students is the best option for their child.

The primary intended audience for the book seems to be black parents raising black children, with some time spent addressing the specific issues of biracial children being raised by one black and one white parent. Only once does Wright discuss transracial adoption, in a very short section dealing with the question of whether race should be considered when placing children with foster or adoptive families (Wright thinks it shouldn’t). This isn’t a criticism of the book; I learned a lot that I can use even as a white parent raising a black child, and I knew before I started reading that I wasn’t exactly the target audience. But I couldn’t help thinking that there is also a need for a similar book written for white parents raising transracially adopted children, because such parents are usually going to face somewhat different challenges. If anyone has any suggestions for books like this, please do let me know about them.

My one major criticism of the book is with regards to how Wright deals with the issue of single mothers. Throughout the book, Wright describes how many of the negative stereotypes about black children which influence how they are treated in school, for example, are due to people conflating race with socio-economic status; there are certain behavioral issues and challenges that children who live in poverty tend to exhibit, and when teachers or school administrators make the assumption that all black children live in poverty, they come to expect that all black children will behave in a certain way and therefore need to be placed in remedial classes or be disciplined strictly and in general have lower expectations placed on them than on white children. But Wright makes the same mistake when she writes “research shows that children who have two parents who are involved in their lives do better in school and are less likely to get in trouble than children who come from single-parent homes,” and then goes on to say that the rise of female-headed single-parent homes in the black community is due in part to the way the welfare system in the US is financially more favorable to families in which the father is absent. I have a very strong hunch that the research showing kids from single-parent homes get into more trouble is based on single-parent families who live in poverty, not on the families of the many single mothers by choice that I know, both black and white, who would laugh at the assumption that they must be on welfare because they are single parents!

This one criticism aside, I highly recommend “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla” for anyone who wants to learn more about how to deal appropriately with race while raising (or teaching) children of any race or ethnicity. This quote from the Epilogue sums up where I believe we need to go from here: “We need to work for comprehensive cultural changes so that a person’s worth is not determined by skin color or race. We need to redefine what it means to be black or African American in a way that allows our children to grow up free to be their true selves, rather than be pressured to conform to some stereotype. We must reject the racist notion that being black means having certain inherent abilities, preferences, lifestyles – and limitations. Nobel Laureate Toni Morrison observes: ‘When you know somebody’s race, what do you know? Virtually nothing.’”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Current
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Anonymous on 01 Apr 2009 at 6:21 am

    Mom Blogs – Blogs for Moms…

Comments

  1. Amy wrote:

    Wow, flashback! I had to read this for a class I took at OU way back in 1999 called “The Black Child.” I still have it, I should pull it out and give it another read.

    Thanks for reminding me that some resources stay current!

  2. Jae Ran wrote:

    I think that another book that I would really encourage everyone to read along with this one is “The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racism” by Debra Van Ausdale and Joe Feagin.

    These two authors and researchers, in a study of a multicultural preschool with children from ages 3-6, actually contradict Wright’s findings that “Just because a pre-schooler can tell us the color of her skin, it doesn’t necessarily follow that she is also aware of her racial identity.” Van Ausdale and Feagin find that children as young as 3 years old have a much more sophisticated and complex understanding of race and the power associated with race than they let on to adults.

    Not to disregard Wright’s book, which is very helpful in many ways – but I think it let’s parents off the hook a little in thinking that these conversations don’t have to be dealt with when kids are young.

    Also, in terms of Piaget, his studies are a little controversial in some groups, considering his work on child development was only with the children of white, middle class Europeans. I would not personally translate his findings of racial identity based on his heterogeneous sample.

  3. Liz wrote:

    Jae Ran – thanks for the info about the Van Ausdale and Feagin book, it sounds worth checking out!

    About Piaget, I don’t think he wrote about the development of racial identity – I could be wrong, it’s been over 20 years since I read his work in college – the point I was trying to make (from Wright’s book) is that his descriptions of how our ability to think and reason develops from infancy through young adulthood can also be applied to skin color and race.

  4. Agibean wrote:

    Jae Ran, I agree with you, though I’ve read neither book. My now-9 year old was three when she turned to me with tears in her eyes and said she wanted to be white like me. When I asked why, she said, “Because white people are better.”

    Despite growing up with her black father and his family very much in her life, how could she not have at least entertained the thought that whites are better when the media is full of positive white images and negative black ones? Black doll experiment, anyone?

    I looked at both books at one time or another, but I came to the conclusion that as with child rearing book in general, there is no one source that can tell us what we know in our hearts to be the right thing to do.

    A preschooler might wish for light skin or long hair or wings in a magical thinking kind of way, but I believe that some of them DO know skin color means more than the author of “I’m Chocolate” gives them credit for.

    I was fortunate to attend a forum by and for youth of color, both adopted and born to mixed families, and they pretty much all disproved the theory that kids don’t recognize color as permanent (and that white isn’t seen as better) when they are very young. All of the youth I spoke to confirmed that at a very young age they realized that they were different from other members of their families, and wished to look like them.

    As I’ve raised my daughter, other than when she was really tiny, I can’t think of a time when race wasn’t part of our daily interactions. She’s ALWAYS straddled the fence of race-one foot on each side, never solidly in either. That’s bound to be sort of ever-present in a kid’s life. But we go with what works for us, and what works has changed as she’s gotten older. I suspect it will continue to change as she reaches her teens and beyond.

  5. Rachel wrote:

    I loved the ‘First R’ — great book, very insightful. I also enjoyed reading “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla”. As funny aside my light-skinned daughter insists that she gets to be chocolate too — she just likes chocolate :-)

    I’m thinking a lot about schools these days and find your summary on schools interesting, Liz. We’ll see where we land but around with private school prices around here it’ll be between us choosing to have add to our family via adoption or send our kids to private school!

  6. Jae Ran wrote:

    Liz, you are totally right and I was typing as I was thinking without clarifying what my point was.

    I agree with you that Piaget wasn’t talking about racial identity in his theory of child development. I was referring in general, his study was based on a very small select sample that was based on White, middle class Europeans. I just feel that with any kind of child development (or for that matter, any research) we need to be good consumers of research and look at who was included in the sample. Especially if we are going to try and generalize.

    In terms of “typical” child development, things may look very different among different populations when you begin to include or parse out race, gender, class, ethnicity, nationality, etc.

    That’s the point I was trying to make, not that Piaget’s study was looking at how children developmentally construct racial identity. Sorry for the confusion there.

  7. Liz wrote:

    Agibean – thanks for your perspective, I’m not a parent yet so it’s helpful to hear from someone with some actual experience.

    Rachel – good luck with your school decision, it’s something I already worry about and as I said I’m not even a parent yet!

  8. atlasien wrote:

    I don’t think it’s an either/or dynamic when it comes to pre-schoolers being aware of race.

    I think that some are, some aren’t, most are in between. It totally depends on environment and personality.

    I certainly wasn’t aware at all until I was about 6 years old and in kindergarten in Japan, and I was raised in a multiracial family and encountered lots of different-looking people when I was a very young child.

    Race is an insanely difficult, abstract, non-intuitive concept.

  9. Liz wrote:

    Jae Ran – thanks for the clarification, I see what you mean now.

  10. Psychobabbler wrote:

    I wante to concur with what Jae Ran and Agibean said by sharing a personal experience. I wrote the following to a fellow white AP about a year and half ago (if you’re reading this, you know who you are), when my son, who is Indian, was FOUR:

    “I have to thank you for saying something in your e-mail that pushed me to look at something I really didn’t want to see. The privileged white mom in me was naively hoping that I could somehow stave off the internalization of that hierarchy for just a little longer by limiting his exposure to mass media and by providing an environment that included many role models with brown skin. We live in a very diverse neighborhood, in a town where the median income for blacks exceeded the median income for whites last I checked, and where he interacts daily with many adults in authority roles who have brown skin, never mind that he has far more (weekly) exposure to my Indian husband’s family than my own…I’ve made sure that the overwhelming majority of books on his shelf are about animals or include people of color (many as the central protagonist). He only watches PBS Kids… The overwhelming majority of videos we own are about animals, anthropomorphized machines, or include people of color. Hell, I even make sure to buy body wash that has a picture of a brown skinned boy on the bottle (Suave Kids, in case you were wondering).

    Anyway, yesterday evening I sucked it up and decided to find out just how much I’d been able to accomplish that staving off. I put on my best psychologist hat and did the doll test (you know, the one where they show kids 2 dolls, one black and one white, and ask them which doll is the nicest, smartest, friendliest, naughtiest, etc. and then at the end, which doll looks like him/her) I pulled up internet photos of two Cabbage Patch Kids boy dolls, one with brown skin and one with white skin, both wearing identical clothes, and put them side by side. And I asked my son the whole series of questions.

    The white doll was the nicest, friendliest, smartest, strongest, most fun, had the most friends, and was the best listener.
    The brown doll was the naughtiest.
    The brown doll looked most like him.

    F**k. My heart sank.”

    What was interesting, though, is that when I repeated the questions with real-life people he knew (the children in his class), rather than projections, this is what happened:

    “He identified other brown skinned kids as the friendliest, smartest, most fun, having the most friends.
    He identified himself as the strongest, the nicest (along with his white best buddy), and the best listener.
    He identified a white child as the naughtiest.”

    To me, therein lies the evidence that, even in the face of internalizing our society’s racism, having ongoing up-close and personal relationships with diverse people is critical to allowing our kids an opportunity to challenge those internalized assumptions about race because they have information that flies in the face of those assumptions.

  11. Janine deManda wrote:

    When I saw the cover of this book at the top of the site today, I literally winced. Here’s a brief review I wrote of it on facebook after trying to read it about six months ago {I admit that I only got to about the halfway point before I couldn’t slog through anymore, but I doubt that what I found troubling about the first half did anything other than thoroughly permeate the second half as well}:

    “The author of this book lives within a few miles of my home, but she writes as if she lives in an entirely different world. I shudder to think that parents are relying on her poorly supported and thoroughly biased theses. Thankfully, several other books on this topic exist, and although they all have their own strengths and weaknesses, all that I have read so far are SO MUCH BETTER than this dismal, deluded tome that I wholeheartedly recommend them in its place. Here are a couple of titles – Does Anybody Else Look Like Me?: A Parent’s Guide to Raising Multiracial Children by Donna Jackson Nakazawa and What Are You?: Voices of Mixed-Race Young People by Pearl Fuyo Gaskins (Editor) – and I’d also suggest checking out http://www.loveisntenough.com and http://www.mavin.net for more resources and other useful books.”

  12. Liz wrote:

    Hi Janine – can you say more about what you found troubling in I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla?

    I’ve got Does Anybody Else Look Like Me? on my reading list so maybe that will be the next one I read since you recommend it. Thanks!

  13. Kia wrote:

    I’m a black mom to bi racial (black/white) children and haven’t read “I’m Chocolate…” but have found the Jackson Nakazawa book to be very informative.

    It’s been a few years since I read it but I appreciated the “Does Anybody Else…” book’s attempts to address all the permutations of multi racial/cultural families.

  14. agibean wrote:

    I want to add that the conference I mentioned in my post above was sponsored by Mavin and it’s HQ is here in Seattle, where I live. The organization does a great deal of excellent work and the website is a treasure trove of information. The group published an excellent book, the “Multiracial Child Resource Book”, which is a combination of first-preson experiences of multiracial youth and expert opinion.

    Though the organization aims primariy at the teen-young adult age group, chances are that if you have a mixed-race, minority or transracially adopted child, you’d find something useful through these folks.

  15. Karyn wrote:

    Hi all,

    I also wrote a review a month or so ago on this book and I am 100% in agreement with Janine, I actually stopped reading at a certain point due to disgust! here is what I wrote:

    The book “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla” is often used as an introduction and guide for parents thinking of adopting children trans-racially. While it does make some valid points and can offer a different perspective on tackling transracial parenting, I believe that there are far better resources now available for people parenting children of colour.
    The author begins the book in its introduction asking us to shield young children from any insight that life for them, as children of colour, may come with unique challenges (pg 7). In my personal experience, children who have been sheltered from reality are shocked to face it later in life, and are then ill-equipped to handle situations as older children/youth. The author asks us to “do whatever we can to reduce our children’s chances of experiencing racial discrimination”. I, for one, am not aware of any parent who [deliberately] puts their children into situations where they will be harmed by racism, and to imply that parents have control over these experiences puts the blame erroneously on parents. While most of us would embrace the opportunity to shield our children from any hurt, we soon realize this is hardly ever in our control, nor is it always in our children’s best interest. Discrimination (the word she uses) or racism (let’s call it by its real name) is based on ignorance and fear, and children at any age should be prepared to deal with racism, and to be able to recognize it for what it is. It is far more effective, in my opinion, to give them the (age appropriate) tools they will need to face racism in all its ugliness, than attempt to shield them from the inevitable. Ignoring racism’s existence is a luxury only afforded to those whom it doesn’t affect – and if you are parenting a child of colour, take heed: it WILL affect you and your child.
    While this book may provide a few valid insights into how children develop racial awareness, it at the same time seemingly discounts any other research done on racial awareness in young children. For example, on page 33, the author discusses how white children may describe a black child as “just need(ing) a good wash”, and that this type of comment does not indicate racism, but is often developmentally appropriate. But, consider how many media sources identify black as “bad” (black cats, witches, any Disney “villain”, terms such as “Black Monday” or “Black Plague”) and white as “good” (hero in white, angels/fairies, “white” magic). A now famous study conducted on preschoolers first done in the 50’s and since repeated with similar outcomes shows very young children (of all colours) repeatedly choosing white dolls over black ones, and ends with this powerful quote:

    Researcher: Why don’t you like yourself?
    Child: Because I’m black .

    Books, movies, and magazine advertisements often portray black men as angry and emotionally aggressive, while white men are portrayed as gentle, kind and sensitive. It is a carefully designed oppression that mimics how women are portrayed in the media, and is designed to keep those in power firmly in place . To ignore the pervasive evidence of this, which the author seems to do, is not only irresponsible, but ultimately delegitimizes the experiences of the children we are ultimately responsible for raising.

    On page 41, the author explains that in order to stop children from using “racial epithets” such as the word “ni**er”, one should refrain from using them in the home. The rest of the entire section is devoted to explaining that blacks should not use the word either, as it is hurtful and derogatory regardless of who utters it. While I am not a fan of the word in general, this implication insinuates an equal playing field amongst blacks who use the word, and whites who use it to demean, denigrate and oppress. Racism is based not only discrimination and prejudice, but also in privilege and power. If one does not posses the power to oppress another through race, gender, sex, etc. then this is discrimination, and not racism. The author does not distinguish between these two ideas, and places all on a level playing field, which is sadly not the case in our society.

    Every page I flipped to after this had sentences filled with erroneous absolutes such as “black adult slaves in turn beat their children”, “blacks have gained equal status in this society” , or “unless adults made it an issue, race was not a problem for them during elementary school years” . I should be sure to tell my son’s kindergarten teacher this, although it will be hard to be in touch with her, as she was dismissed for blatant racism in her classroom. This is where I stopped reading. There are so many wonderful books, workshops and websites out there (see below) to guide parents into the world of trans-racial parenting; sadly, I would not consider this to be one of them.

    Karyn

  16. Virginia wrote:

    I have heard so many different perspectives on this book. Unfortunately,the POC I know who have read it did not like it (for the reasons outlined so clearly by Karyn), and most of the white parents of transracial adoptees I have asked about it loved it. That scares me.

    I haven’t read it yet, but I am planning to, if only to make up my own mind on such a polarizing book. I would love to hear if anyone had a different response than the two I mentioned above. Is this book just another example of white privilege “not getting it”? If so, the word needs to be spread because it is touted all over as “If you read one book about race before you adopt transracially, read this one.”

  17. Liz wrote:

    Agibean – thanks for the reference to Mavin and the book they put together, I will look for it.

    Karyn – thanks for offering a different perspective. I didn’t interpret Wright as saying we should shield children from racism, but instead that there are ways to deal with it in age appropriate ways. Could you share some of the resources you mention at the end of your review that you found more helpful than Wright’s book?

  18. Janine deManda wrote:

    Liz wrote:

    “Hi Janine – can you say more about what you found troubling in I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla?

    I’ve got Does Anybody Else Look Like Me? on my reading list so maybe that will be the next one I read since you recommend it. Thanks!”

    My apologies for my delayed response. I can read from work, but not post, and this is the first chance I’ve had to post from home.

    Karyn’s post above essentially expresses the gist of my disgust with this book. I didn’t experience Wright’s blithe prose as providing “appropriate ways” to deal with racism. Above and beyond what Karyn noted above, Wright flat out states that if children experience “problems” related to race in pre- and grammar school, it’s just because the adults in their lives are misleading them by talking about racism as if it exists. The particular example that stands out most in my memory at the moment included not only that head-in-the-sand tripe, but the single mother blaming that you noted in your review.

    My mother and maternal grandmother disagreed about at what age it would be appropriate to begin teaching me, a white-skinned mixed blood, about the history of race and oppression and genocide in this country. My mother and an almost utterly white grade school milieu prevailed until I was about 7 and came home from school with the sanitized version from my social studies class. My gramma sat me down and roughed out the real deal for me. Having been sheltered so successfully left me feeling completely blindsided. Before that time, I had been aware of the complexity of my heritage, but I hadn’t been aware of so much else that I felt in a rush all the conflict of carrying the colonizer and the colonized in my body in several different combinations. I’d've much preferred to have been given a more complete, if age appropriately-circumscribed map of the world all along.

    So, based on my own lived experience, I strongly assert that Wright and her book are full of horseshit, and like Virginia, I am terrified and saddened that so many white transracially adoptive parents rave about it so. {note to Virginia: Wright is a black woman, so though she definitely doesn’t get it at all in any way that I could discern, she has managed to sustain that obtuseness even in the absence of white privilege}.

    Jackson Nakazawa’s writing includes some aspects that I had difficulty with {such as her offhand assertion that since mother’s carry genetic material from their children for years after their births, she was now Japanese, too}, she nonetheless had a much firmer grasp on reality than Wright, and therefore, she offered much more that I found useful in the pages of her book. I’d also enthusiastically second the recommendation of the Multiracial Child Resource Book. Although some parts of it are clearly products of the debate around the 2000 census, it still includes abundant resource information.

  19. Janine deManda wrote:

    Another thing I detest about this book is the title. Given the positive reviews I read of it, I chose to actively overcome my aversion to the title to read it, and then I wished I’d just gone with my first impulse. People are not food. The problematics of using language that reduces people to consumables has not gone unaddressed in anti-racist discourse, yet this book unapologetically goes exactly there. Yeesh.

  20. Rachael wrote:

    I agree with several of the posters above who found Wright’s book to be woefully lacking. Virginia, you’re right, white transracial adoptive parents seem to love it; I see this book lauded again and again in the adoption groups I belong to. I am a white mother of two black children, but I didn’t like this book for many of the same reasons that Karyn outlined, and funny enough, also couldn’t even finish it (although I got pretty far into it- it was like a train wreck that I couldn’t turn my eyes away from…).

    I suspect the reason for its popularity amongst white adoptive parents has something to do with Wright’s reassuring message that our children are blissfully unaware of their race through much of their early childhood, that our society has essentially moved on from racism, etc. She makes it seem like raising emotionally healthy black children is a responsibility that anyone can easily take on- after all, it’s not so hard to avoid using the “n” word at home, is it? Or to teach our children not to “use race as a crutch for their own lack of effort or other failings” at school? As if that’s a far more common problem than black children facing peers or teachers who treat them unfairly or with cruelty because of their race. Overall, the book is a bizarre treatise on the bad behaviors of blacks- I am baffled by Wright’s choice of such a vehicle for delivering her message that blacks should stop calling whites “honky” and “blue-eyed devils” and “popping” their kids for misbehaving. Black parents are not responsible for perpetuating racism (and as a previous poster noted, thinking so ignores two essential aspects- POWER and PRIVILEGE- of racism) in our society today, but Wright seems to think otherwise. And gives white readers permission to think so, too.

    I think that Donna Nakazawa’s book is far more helpful in terms of preparing parents in multiracial families to be race-concious allies to their children as she arms them with techniques and messages to usher their children through each stage of childhood. If I could assign mandatory reading to white parents considering transracial adoption, it would probably be Nakazawa’s book along with Beverly Tatum’s “Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in The Cafeteria” and Tim Wise’s “White Like Me.” Books with more than a little critical thinking involved, that challenge parents to consider their own privileges and how their children’s life experiences and racial development will differ from their own as a result of the absence of those privileges. Wright’s book would absolutely NOT be on the list- there’s nothing in “I’m Chocolate, You’re Vanilla” that others haven’t said better.

  21. Liz wrote:

    Janine and Rachael – thanks for your perspectives. Janine, I especially appreciate what you shared about your own experience of race growing up. I think I will have to back to read Wright’s book again with everyone’s comments in mind, you’ve given me a lot to think about that I didn’t see the first time I read the book. And thank you to everyone for all of the other book recommendations, some I had already planned to read but others were new to me!

  22. Karyn wrote:

    I just wanted to share a few more resources as someone had asked. Although maybe not directly related to adoption, I would highly recommend the article by Peggy MacIntosh on White priviledge – a lot to think about packed into this little essay! It can be found here: http://www.nymbp.org/reference/WhitePrivilege.pdf

    I also highly recommend anything by John Raible, and if you can hear him speak, all the better. His site is here: http://johnraible.wordpress.com/

    A few other books are:

    Black Baby, White Hands: a View from the Crib – Jaiya John

    Tripping on the Color Line: Black/white Multiracial Families in a Racially Divided World – Heather M. Dalmage

    What Are You?: Voices of Mixed-Race Young People – Pearl Fuyo Gaskins (Editor)

    And I will definitely be looking into the other books some of you suggested – thank you!

  23. Psychobabbler wrote:

    I would also recommend Maria P.P. Root’s work. It can sometimes be a little more academic, but Maria has been a pioneer in the literature on multiracial identity. Here’s her website:

    http://www.drmariaroot.com/

  24. little mixed girl wrote:

    I read (more like flipped) through this book a number of years ago.
    I picked it up thinking that it was going to have something interesting to say about multiracial identity, but I was very disappointed with what I saw.
    Again, it’s been a few years since I looked at it, but if I remember correctly, the last chapter dealt with mixed kids, and the author seemed to be pushing for a monoracial identity.
    Saying that they are better off identifying as monoracial or something like that.
    In fact, that’s probably the first chapter I skipped to and read.

    I want the author to give back those minutes of my life that I wasted.
    And “Black kids in the Cafeteria” was also a major disappointment to me too.
    Tatum also seemed to trivialize multiracial identity to me too. (again, I read this one years ago).
    I would not recommend either of those books to anyone…

  25. UUJessica wrote:

    Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!

    Yes, many of Wright’s comments are distasteful and opinionated.
    Yes, the book is written from the perspective of a fairly conservative African American woman and intended for a similar audience who is raising African American children–presumably in a 2-parent household.

    However, when it comes to what children ‘get’ about race, Wright is right!
    Her suggestions for what is age-appropriate for teachers to have and do in their classrooms are spot-on.
    Her charts and developmental stages of racial awareness are accurate, unless, as she herself points out, a child has been ‘racialized’ early on.

    Unfortunately, we live in a culture here in the US where that is almost inescapable.

    Personally, I don’t want my children’s teachers talking to them about race and ethnicity–I’ve known too many situations in which a well-intentioned teacher did a great deal of damage by trying to be helpful.

    Each child and family is unique and the degree to which a child has been ‘racialized’ varies from situation to situation and place to place–a multiracial family will have vastly different experiences if they are living in Queens, Havana, San Juan, Sydney, London, or Johannesburg.

    As with all things, take from this book what is useful for, and relevant to you and your family, and leave the rest.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.